Football fans, politicians and governing bodies have become united after the rage as the 12 largest sports teams announced plans to break away from European football leagues and create their own “Super League” act, an existential threat to the world’s favorite sports.
Here’s an overview of what you need to know about plans and why they matter.
What is the European Super League?
In the new league, 12 elite groups from across Europe would start their own tournament without qualifying or promotion, which they are expected to eventually expand to 20 clubs. Each year, five teams were allowed to participate in the competition.
The competition “is scheduled to begin as soon as possible,” was announced on the website of 12 clubs, and is likely to result in teams being dropped or banned in current competitions.
Who is behind the plans?
Six English clubs – Arsenal, Chelsea Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur – as well as three teams from Italy – AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus – and three from Spain – Atlético Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid – are behind plans. .
U.S. investment bank JP Morgan confirmed to CNN on Monday that it would fund the proposed tournament.
What is the background?
Owners of the world’s largest clubs have long been excited about the greater share of football’s television revenue and other financial benefits, while more traditional supporters have disintegrated the increasingly indisputable importance of money in the game.
Over the decades, billions in acquisitions from various teams such as Manchester City and Chelsea have widened the gap between football matches, and it is very rare for teams outside a small elite group to win a Major League trophy.
This difference has been rumored in the “Super League” for years, and some have suggested that the clubs involved could be persuaded to agree to an economic compromise. But Sunday’s announcement is by far the closest football ever to such a dramatic breakthrough.
Why does this matter?
The central principle of football is that trophies and success are based on competition, and no team secures its place in the Football Association or is immune from falling. The “Super League” model breaks the ancient structure and introduces a closed tournament to which only some of the richest and most famous clubs in the world have been invited.
The financial consequences of moving to existing leagues and teams can be catastrophic; For example, the Premier League devalues without the biggest names and can lose huge sums on TV deals. Even fans of lower league clubs fear the disadvantages of change, especially after the pandemic that left many teams in financial turmoil.
And for many fans, the idea is inherently contrary to the essence of football. Adverse victories, leagues where big teams compete with low opponents, and adventure stories like Leicester City’s major Premier League title success in 2016 would end if the world’s largest team leaves the established football universe to play against each other.
As a result, the plans have achieved something that is rarely seen in the sport: fans of all teams and the governing bodies of the sport unite in angry opposition.
What is the answer?
The governing bodies of football have not acted as planned and have issued statements condemning the European Super League and threatening its consequences.
FIFA, the global football federation, condemned the establishment of the Super League, saying it violated FIFA’s principles of solidarity, integration, integrity and fair economic redistribution.
UEFA – which oversees all European football – signed an angry statement with the English, Spanish and Italian administrations and the top aviation leagues of the three countries, promising to “end this cynical project … a few self-interested project clubs at a time when society needs more solidarity than ever .